Oral arguments were heard this week in Harvard v. Trump’s cross motions for summary judgment. Summary judgment, or “judgment on the papers,” means both sides agree on the facts but disagree on how the law applies to those facts. Neither Harvard nor the Trump administration dispute that Trump made (...)
Site référencé: Raw Story
Raw Story
Epstein believed Trump was the 'rat' who snitched on him to FBI : biographer
24/07/2025
This surrender to Trump is a symptom of our national disease
24/07/2025
'President’s official fanboy' : Analyst reveals why Trump sidelined JD Vance
24/07/2025
Trump cheers $200 million Columbia University settlement, says other schools 'upcoming'
24/07/2025
'The worst conspiracy I have ever heard' : CNN panel slams Trump's story on Epstein files
24/07/2025
'Slap in the face' : Vet fumes as Afghan interpreter who saved his life faces deportation
24/07/2025
